UK funding preparation guide
KTP and technology readiness: prepare a university-business project
A Knowledge Transfer Partnership is a collaboration route, not a general equipment grant. Begin with the business challenge and the knowledge the business needs from a university or other eligible knowledge base.
Guide reviewed:
Teams deciding where to spend application time
UK organisations and advisers checking a specific funding route before committing application time.
Make the first review more concrete
Prepare a Knowledge Transfer Partnership enquiry with a business challenge, knowledge-base partner, project evidence and technology readiness assumptions.
Review workflow
What FundingLens helps you do
Keep source facts, caveats and next actions together so your team can decide what deserves attention before application work starts.
Write a one-page challenge brief: the current capability gap, why it matters commercially, the specialist knowledge required and the intended change. Identify a business sponsor who can provide time, access and implementation ownership.
Discuss the brief with the knowledge base's KTP office. Confirm the current competition, partner roles, associate arrangements and business contribution before building a full proposal. A conventional research subcontract and a KTP have different structures.
Describe technology readiness using evidence rather than a self-awarded label. Distinguish a concept, lab demonstration, relevant-environment test and operational deployment, then use the definitions required by the particular call. Different disciplines may need different evidence for apparently similar readiness stages.
For consortium work beyond KTP, allocate work packages, budget, intellectual property questions and decision rights early. Keep assumptions requiring specialist review separate from confirmed call conditions and obtain institutional approvals before submission.
Readiness checks
- Business challenge and sponsor identified.
- Knowledge-base KTP office contacted.
- Current competition and contribution checked.
- Readiness claims supported by test evidence.
- Partner responsibilities and approvals recorded.
Eligibility caveats
- A TRL description alone does not establish competition eligibility.
- Partner rules and funding contributions must be confirmed for the current call.
- FundingLens does not negotiate consortium agreements or assess research quality.
Source references
Follow KTP and technology readiness: prepare a university-business project funding
Create your profile to follow relevant opportunities and prepare your evidence. Future rounds and notification timing depend on published scheme information and your account settings.
Related FundingLens pages
Track UKRI funding with checks for council scope, applicant eligibility, Funding Finder deadlines, attachments, evidence and source citations.
Grant guideHorizon Europe funding for UK applicantsCheck Horizon Europe funding for UK applicants with guidance on calls, UKRI rules, partner roles, PICs, guarantee context and source verification.
R&D grantsR&D grants checked against competition scopeR&D grant alerts with source-cited checks for UKRI and Innovate UK scope, applicant rules, collaboration, eligible costs and deadlines.