Eligibility review

Eligibility checks with evidence, caveats and confidence

FundingLens makes eligibility easier to inspect by showing what the source says, what the organisation profile says and where judgement is still needed.

Best for

Teams deciding where to spend application time

Teams that need to screen funding leads before spending hours on application packs.

Use this page to

Make the first review more concrete

Check whether an organisation is eligible for grant funding.

Review workflow

What FundingLens helps you do

Keep source facts, caveats and next actions together so your team can decide what deserves attention before application work starts.

01

Common checks include legal form, trading status, charity registration, geography, project theme, beneficiary group and previous funding.

02

Ambiguous source wording is flagged as a caveat instead of being hidden inside a score.

03

The audit trail stores source fields, AI reasoning, confidence and human review status.

Readiness checks

  • Compare applicant legal form with source wording.
  • Check location and delivery-area restrictions.
  • Flag any unclear wording for human review.

Eligibility caveats

  • FundingLens explains fit signals, eligibility caveats and next steps; it does not promise funding success or application approval.
  • Always check the official funder page before acting because deadlines, match-funding rules and eligible costs can change.
  • AI output stays separate from verified source facts and needs human review before it is used in an application.

Source references

Related FundingLens pages