Source intelligence

Funding source monitoring with provenance from day one

FundingLens treats source monitoring as a public evidence trail: which official page was checked, what was captured, when it was reviewed and what still needs human judgement.

Best for

Teams deciding where to spend application time

Teams that need reliable public-source monitoring and an audit trail for each opportunity.

Use this page to

Make the first review more concrete

Understand which public funding sources a grant intelligence tool monitors.

Review workflow

What FundingLens helps you do

Keep source facts, caveats and next actions together so your team can decide what deserves attention before application work starts.

01

Start with official or clearly attributable public pages, then record the source URL, checked date, funder, deadline, amount range and applicant rules.

02

Keep source facts separate from AI summaries so users can see what came from the funder and what is FundingLens interpretation.

03

Show coverage limits honestly: paused sources, stale pages, missing dates and ambiguous rules should be visible before alerts are trusted.

Readiness checks

  • Confirm the opportunity comes from an official or clearly attributable public source.
  • Record the source URL, checked date, deadline and key eligibility fields.
  • Flag stale pages, missing dates or ambiguous applicant rules before showing alerts.

Eligibility caveats

  • FundingLens explains fit signals, eligibility caveats and next steps; it does not promise funding success or application approval.
  • Always check the official funder page before acting because deadlines, match-funding rules and eligible costs can change.
  • AI output stays separate from verified source facts and needs human review before it is used in an application.

Source references

Related FundingLens pages