Grant guide

Funder research checklist before shortlisting a grant

Funder research helps teams understand whether an opportunity is genuinely aligned before they commit to a full application.

Best for

Teams deciding where to spend application time

Applicants, fundraisers and grant consultants building a shortlist from public funding sources.

Use this page to

Make the first review more concrete

Learn how to research a grant funder before applying.

Review workflow

What FundingLens helps you do

Keep source facts, caveats and next actions together so your team can decide what deserves attention before application work starts.

01

Check the funder's purpose, programme priorities, who they fund, what they exclude, typical award size and decision route.

02

Look at current source wording first, then use older awards or guidance only as context rather than proof that a fund is open now.

03

Record reporting burden, match requirements, decision criteria, FAQ caveats and contact notes where they affect the apply-or-skip decision.

Readiness checks

  • Official source URL and latest update saved.
  • Applicant and project fit checked against current wording.
  • Exclusions, deadlines and funding amounts reviewed.
  • Reporting burden and evidence expectations noted.
  • Old awards are treated as context, not live eligibility proof.

Eligibility caveats

  • Do not infer current openness from old award announcements.
  • Funder priorities can shift between rounds.
  • FundingLens research notes should support, not replace, a final source check.

Source references

Related FundingLens pages