Grant guide

Board pack for grant applications and trustee approval

Some grant decisions need trustee, director or committee approval before a team can apply. A good board pack makes the decision clear, evidenced and proportionate.

Best for

Teams deciding where to spend application time

Charity and CIC leaders preparing internal approval for higher-value, higher-risk or strategically important grant applications.

Use this page to

Make the first review more concrete

Prepare a board pack or trustee decision note for a grant application.

Review workflow

What FundingLens helps you do

Keep source facts, caveats and next actions together so your team can decide what deserves attention before application work starts.

01

Summarise the opportunity, funder purpose, requested amount, match requirement, deadline, restrictions, delivery commitments and reporting burden.

02

Set out the decision needed, conflicts or related-party issues, delegated authority, financial controls and risks to reserves or cash flow.

03

Attach source citations and readiness gaps so trustees can see what is known, what is assumed and what still needs review.

Readiness checks

  • Decision, authority and conflicts recorded.
  • Opportunity fit and source caveats summarised.
  • Budget, match funding and restricted-fund issues reviewed.
  • Delivery capacity and reporting obligations assessed.
  • Finance sign-off and source-cited evidence included.

Eligibility caveats

  • This is governance support, not legal advice.
  • Approval needs vary by governing document, delegation rules and grant risk.
  • Boards should not approve applications on AI summaries without source review.

Source references

Related FundingLens pages