Draft notes guide

Source-cited draft notes for grant applications

Draft notes are useful preparation material only when the team can trace claims back to official funder pages and separate source facts from AI wording.

Best for

Teams deciding where to spend application time

Teams using AI-assisted preparation material for funding applications and internal opportunity reviews.

Use this page to

Make the first review more concrete

Learn how to use AI notes for grant applications without losing source citations.

Review workflow

What FundingLens helps you do

Keep source facts, caveats and next actions together so your team can decide what deserves attention before application work starts.

01

Start each note with the official source URL, fetched date and the exact eligibility or deadline point being summarised.

02

Use AI to organise notes, not to invent evidence. Claims about need, impact, costs or eligibility should have a source or internal evidence owner.

03

Before submission, a human should check every funder claim, caveat and deadline against the live source page.

Readiness checks

  • Source URL saved beside each note.
  • Verified facts separated from interpretation.
  • Eligibility caveats assigned for review.
  • Organisation evidence owner named.
  • Final human review completed before use.

Eligibility caveats

  • FundingLens explains fit signals, eligibility caveats and next steps; it does not promise funding success or application approval.
  • Always check the official funder page before acting because deadlines, match-funding rules and eligible costs can change.
  • AI output stays separate from verified source facts and needs human review before it is used in an application.

Source references

Related FundingLens pages