Grant guide

Grant data provenance for funding alerts

Grant data provenance is the record of where a funding fact came from, when it was fetched and what changed before it reached a user-facing alert.

Best for

Teams deciding where to spend application time

Operations leads, consultants and funding teams that need to trust public-source grant records before acting on them.

Use this page to

Make the first review more concrete

Understand how funding alert data should record source URLs, timestamps and caveats.

Review workflow

What FundingLens helps you do

Keep source facts, caveats and next actions together so your team can decide what deserves attention before application work starts.

01

Store the official source URL, fetched timestamp, source name, raw fields, normalised fields and parser status for every reviewed opportunity.

02

Keep known gaps visible, such as missing deadline fields, ambiguous geography, closed programme status or a source page that changed after fetch.

03

Attach provenance to alerts, saved opportunities and draft notes so reviewers can move from AI-assisted summary back to the original evidence.

Readiness checks

  • Source URL and fetched timestamp recorded.
  • Raw source fields retained separately from normalised fields.
  • Parser warnings and missing fields visible.
  • AI summary and fit reasoning marked as inference.
  • Human review status recorded before live alert use.

Eligibility caveats

  • Provenance is not a funder endorsement or guarantee of current eligibility.
  • A clean source record can still become stale if the funder changes the page.
  • Automated fetches need failure states and human review for ambiguous records.

Source references

Related FundingLens pages