Grant guide

Human review status for AI grant alerts

Human review status tells a team whether AI-assisted funding analysis is still a draft, needs checking, is approved for use, or should not be sent.

Best for

Teams deciding where to spend application time

Funding teams, consultants and operators reviewing AI-generated grant summaries, alert previews and application notes.

Use this page to

Make the first review more concrete

Understand human review status in AI-assisted grant matching and alerts.

Review workflow

What FundingLens helps you do

Keep source facts, caveats and next actions together so your team can decide what deserves attention before application work starts.

01

Use draft or AI drafted for outputs that have not been checked against source pages and organisation evidence.

02

Use needs review when source data is incomplete, confidence is low, eligibility is ambiguous or a deadline makes action risky.

03

Use approved, no-send or superseded states so alert previews, saved opportunities and draft notes do not become accidental customer communications.

Readiness checks

  • AI output marked as draft until checked.
  • Source facts and caveats reviewed by a human.
  • No-send state available for unsafe alerts.
  • Approved state tied to source citations.
  • Superseded records retained for audit context.

Eligibility caveats

  • Human review status supports safer workflows; it is not legal assurance.
  • Approved for review does not mean a grant application will succeed.
  • Review states must be visible to users and backed by audit records.

Source references

Related FundingLens pages