Grant guide

Theory of change for grant applications

A theory of change explains why a project should lead to the outcomes it claims. It connects need, beneficiaries, activities, assumptions and evidence.

Best for

Teams deciding where to spend application time

Charities, CICs, community groups and consultants asked to explain project logic in a funding application.

Use this page to

Make the first review more concrete

Understand how to use a theory of change in a grant application.

Review workflow

What FundingLens helps you do

Keep source facts, caveats and next actions together so your team can decide what deserves attention before application work starts.

01

Start with the problem and target group, then map activities, outputs, short-term outcomes, longer-term outcomes and assumptions.

02

Check whether the project has evidence for the causal links it is claiming, or whether those links need to be framed as assumptions for review.

03

Keep the model proportionate: a small community grant may need a short logic chain, not a full evaluation framework.

Readiness checks

  • Problem, audience and need are specific.
  • Activities, outputs and outcomes connect logically.
  • Assumptions and external risks are visible.
  • Evidence or source citations support key claims.
  • The model is proportionate to the grant size.

Eligibility caveats

  • A theory of change is not proof that the project will work.
  • Vague outcome language can weaken an application.
  • FundingLens can structure notes, but teams should review final logic and evidence.

Source references

Related FundingLens pages